Academicus International Scientific Journal

Title:

Formulaic Sequences and Meta-Discourse Markers in Applied Linguistics Research Papers.


Full Reference List:

1. Abdulaal, M. A. A. (2020). A cross-linguistic analysis of formulaic language and meta-discourse in linguistics research articles by natives and Arabs: Modeling Saudis and Egyptians. Arab World English Journal, 11 (3). 193- 211. DOI:https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.12
2. Aimah, S., Mulyadi, D., & Ifadah, M. (2019). Metadiscourse markers written in introduction section of final project of Unimus learners. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(2), 109-118. DOI: 10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1717.
3. Akbaş, E. (2012). Exploring metadiscourse in master’s dissertation abstracts: Cultural and linguistic variations across postgraduate writers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(1), 12-26
4. Alyousef, H, S. (2015). A multimodal discourse analysis of international postgraduate business students’ finance texts: An investigation of theme and information value, Social Semiotics, DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2015.1124518
5. Alyousef, H. S. (2015). an investigation of metadiscourse features in international postgraduate business students’ texts: The Use of Interactive and Interactional Markers in Tertiary Multimodal Finance Texts. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015610796
6. Anwardeen, N. H., Luyee, E. O., Gabriel, J. I., & Kalajahi, S. A. (2013). An analysis: The usage of metadiscourse in argumentative writing by Malaysian tertiary level of students. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 83-96. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v6n9p83.
7. Assassi, T., & Benyelles, R. (2016). formulaic language for improving communicative competence. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(2), 163-176.
8. Bal-Gezegin, B., & Baş, M. (2020). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A comparison of research articles and book reviews. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 45-62. Doi: 10.32601/ejal.710204
9. Bouchemet, T. (2019). Interactional metadiscourse in applied linguistics master theses: a corpus-based comparative study. ،ةيناسنإلا مولعلا ةلجم(51), 57–70. Retrieved from http://revue.umc.edu.dz/index.php/h/article/view/3060
10. Boudersa, N. (2014). Connective Expressions as Metadiscourse Markers of Writing Quality in Undergraduate Students’ Expository Writing. مولعلا ةلجم 45-56 ,ةيناسنإلا .
11. Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher-level metatext in Ph.D. theses. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 18: S41–S56.
12. Burneikaitė, N. (2008). Metadiscourse in linguistics master’s theses in English L1 and L2. KALBOTYRA, 59(3), 38- 47. Doi: 10.15388/Klbt.2008.7591
13. Burneikaitė, N. (2009). Metadiscoursal connectors in linguistics MA theses in English L1&L2. KALBOTYRA, 61(3), 36-50.
14. Cheng, X., & Steffensen, M.S. (1996). Metadiscourse: A technique for improving student writing. Journal of Research in the Teaching of English, 30(2).
15. Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: a cross-linguistic study of newspaper. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 95-113. DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003
16. Duruk, E. (2017). Analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic written discourse produced by Turkish researchers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 01-09.
17. Farjami, H. (2013). A Corpus-Based Study of the Lexical Make-up of Applied Linguistics Article Abstracts. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 32(2), 27-50.
18. Gjergji, S. (2015). A pragmatic analyses of the use of types of deixis in poetry and novels of the author Ismail Kadare-The importance and complexity to the pragmatic process concerning the different realities evoked in social interaction, communication and language. Academicus International Scientific Journal, (12), 134-146.
19. Ho, V., & Li, C. (2018). The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first-year university students timed argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 53–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.001
20. Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to Students: Metadiscourse in introductory course books. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 3-26. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00025-2
21. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
22. Hyland, K. (2010) Metadiscourse: mapping interactions in academic writing. Nordic J. English Stud. 9 (2), 125-143.
23. Lee, J. J., & Casal, J. E. (2014). Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering. System, 46(1), 39-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2014.07.009
24. Marandi, S. (2003). Metadiscourse in Persian/English master’s theses: A contrastive study. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 23-42.
25. Martin-Martin, P. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25–43.
26. Mirshamsi, A., & Allami, H. (2013). Metadiscourse markers in the discussion/conclusion section of Persian and English master’s theses. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 5(3), 23-40.
27. Ren, H., & Li, Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and master’s foreign-language theses. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 162-166.
28. Saeeaw, S., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2014). Rhetorical Variation across Research Article Abstracts in Environmental Science and Applied Linguistics. English Language Teaching, 7, 81-93.
29. Santos, M. B. (1995). Academic abstracts: A genre analysis. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil.
30. Santos, M. B. D. (2019). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16, 481-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.481
31. Swales, J. M. & Feak C. B. (2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. Michigan ELT, 2009. http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=309332
32. Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/357609
33. Yeganeh, M., Heravi, I., Sawari, A. (2015). Hedge and booster in newspaper articles on Iran’s presidential election: a comparative study of English and Persian articles. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 679-683.
34. Zakaria, M.K., & Malik, F.A. (2018). Metadiscourse in academic writing of pre-university Arab students at the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). MATEC Web Conferences 150 05086 (2018) DOI:10.1051/matecconf/201815005086

 Back to article



Academicus
International Scientific Journal

pISSN 2079-3715
eISSN 2309-1088

Address:
Sheshi i Flamurit, Rruga Muze
Al-9401 Vlorë, Albania
Tel: +355 68 60 60 555
info@academicus.edu.al
https://academicus.edu.al