Academicus International Scientific Journal

Title:

What should Marxism propose to International Relations?


Full Reference List:

1. Agnew, John. (2005), Hegemony: The New Shape of Global Power, Temple University Press.
2. Anderson K (2007) Dialectics today. Lecture published by the Marxist-Humanist Committee. Available at: http://marxisthumanismtoday.org/print/node/2.
3. Anderson, P. (1999), The Origins of Post-Modernity, London: Verso.
4. Arend, Lijphart. (1974a), “International relations theory: great debates and lesser debates”, International Social Science Journal, 26, 11–21.
5. Arrighi, G. (1994), The long Twentieth Century, London: Verso.
6. Ashley, Richard K. (1986), “The Poverty of Neorealism”, pp. 289, 258, 290- 1, in Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), (1986), Neorealism and its Critics, New York: Colombia University Press.
7. Berki, R. N. (1971), “On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations’, World Politics, October, Vol. 24.
8. Blackburn, Robin, “Fin-de-Siècle: Socialism after the Crash”, New Left Review, No.185, (Jan/Feb 1991).
9. Bloom, S. (1941) The World of Nations: a study of the national implications in the work of Karl Marx, New York: Columbia University Press.
10. Boggs, Carl. (2010), “Intellectuals and Empire” In Academic Repression. Edited by Anthony Nocella et al. New York: AK Press, p. 455.
11. Bourdieu, P. (1992), Responses, Paris: Seuil, 86, 136ff.
12. Bottomore, T. (1975), Marxist Sociology, London: The Macmillan Press Ltd, p10.
13. Bottomore, T. (1983), (ed) A Dictionary of Marxist Thought, Oxford.
14. Bull, H., 1966. “Society and Anarchy in International Relations” in Butterfield, H. & Wight, M, (eds.) Diplomatic Investigations, London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
15. Buhle, P. (1987), Marxism in the United States: Remapping the American Left, London: Verso: Haymarket Series.
16. Carr, Edward H. (1961), What is History, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
17. Cohen, G. A. (1978), Karl Marx’s Theory of History: a Defence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18. Cox, R. “Social forces, states and word orders: beyond International Relations theory”, in Neorealism and its Critics, (1986), edited by R. Keohane, New York: Colombia University Press.
19. Cox, R W. (1987), Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History, New York: Columbia University Press.
20. Cox, Robert W. & Sinclair, Timothy J. (1996), (eds.), Approaches to World Order, Cambridge University Press.
21. Chalmers, F. (1982), What is This Thing Called Science? Second Edition (St. Lucia, Queensland: University of Queensland Press.
22. Derrida, J. (1993), Spectres of Marx, Paris: Galilee.
23. Fukuyama, F. (1992), The End of History and the Last Man Standing, London: Hamish Hamilton.
24. Furet, F. (1999), The passing of an illusion: The idea of Communism in the twentieth century, (eds.), (trans), Debora Furet, London: The University Chicago Press.
25. Geras, N. (1971), “Essence and Appearance: Aspects of Fetishism in Marx’s ‘Capital’”, New Left Review, Vol. 65 (Jan-Feb), pp. 69-85, p.79.
26. Gills, B.K. “Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory”, Millennium: Journal ofInternational Studies, Vol. 16, No. 2, Summer 1987.
27. Gramsci, A. (1971), Selection from Prison Notebooks, (ed and trans), Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith, London: Lawrence & Wishart.
28. Gramsci, A. “La rivoluzione contro il Capitale”, [1917], in G. Gerrata and N. Gallo, (1964), (eds.), 2000 Pagine di Gramsci, Vol.1, Milan: Il Saggiatore.
29. Halliday, Fred. (1994), Rethinking International Relations, London: Macmillan.
30. Halliday, Fred. (1999), Revolution in World Politics, London: Macmillan.
31. Heilbroner, R. (1980) Marxism: For and Against, London: Norton.
32. Hoffman, Stanley. (1959), “International Relations: The Long Road to Theory” World Politics 11 (3): pp346-77.
33. Hollis, M. & Smith, S. (1990), Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Oxford University Press, USA.
34. Honneth, A. (2008), “The social dynamics of disrespect: On the location of critical theory today”. In: Disrespect (trans. Ganahl. J). Cambridge: Polity Press.
35. King, G. & Keohane, R. & Verba, S. (1994), Designing Social Inquiry, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36. Korsch, Karl. (1963), Karl Marx, New York: Russell and Russell.
37. Kubálková, V. & Cruickshank, A. A., (1985), Marxism and International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press, p.9.
38. Lakatos, I. and A. Musgrave, (1974), (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Lapid, Yosef “The third debate: On the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era”, International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 33 (1989): 235.
40. Lenin, V.I. (2004), Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism, New York: International Publishers:
41. Linklater, Andrew. “Marxism”, in Burchill, S et al., Theories of International Relations, 4th eds., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
42. Linklater, A. (1996), “The achievements of critical theory”. In: Smith S, Booth K and Zalewski M (eds) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Linklater, Andrew. (2000), International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science, (Eds. III), London: Routledge p. 1184.
44. Maclean, J. (1988), “Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect” Millennium Journal of International Studies. 17(2). pp. 295- 319.
45. Maghroori, R. and Ramberg, Bennet. (eds), (1982), Globalism versus Realism: International Relations’ Third Debate (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
46. Malo, Egni. "Antonio Gramsci’s role in Marxian thought and the contribution made to international relations by those using his ideas." Academicus International Scientific Journal 7 (2013): 96-116.
47. Malo, E. “Social praxis, party and class relations today”, Academicus International Scientific Journal, 9. (2014), pp172-198.
48. Marcuse, H. (1972), Studies in Critical Philosophy, (trans), Joris de Bres, London: New Left Books.
49. Kandal, T. (1989), “Marx & Engels on International Relations etc.”, in Studies of Development and Change in the Modern World¸ Open University Press.
50. Karl Marx, (1969), Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844, New York: International Publishers.
51. Marx K. (1971), Capital, Vol. I, (trans). Moore S and Aveling E, ed. Engels F. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
52. Marx, K. (1976), Capital, London: Penguin.
53. Marx, K. (1976), Preface and Introduction to “A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy”, Beijing: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
54. Marx, K. (1976), The German Ideology: Including Theses on Feuerbach and Introduction to The Critique of Political Economy, Prometheus Books.
55. Marx, K. (1978), “The Manifesto of the Communist Party”, The Marx-Engels Reader, (ed), Robert Tucker. New York: WW Norton & Company.
56. Marx, K. (2009), [1843]). A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction. Available at: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/ works/1843/critique-hpr/intro.htm
57. Meister, R. (1990), Political Identity: Thinking through Marx, Oxford: Blackwell.
58. Morgenthau, Hans J. (1985), Politics Among Nations, New York: McGraw-Hill, p13.
59. Murphy, Craig. “The Promise of Critical IR, partially kept”, Review of International Studies, Vol.33, (2007): 121.
60. Ollman, B. (2003), Dance of the Dialectic: Steps in Marx’s Method, Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.
61. Paterson, Thomas G. “The Origins of the Cold War” OAH Magazine of History Vol. 2, No. 1 (Summer, 1986): 7.
62. Richard Falk, (1997), “The Grotian Moment: Unfulfilled Promise, Harmless Fantasy, Missed Opportunity?” International Insights 13, No.3.
63. Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye, (1977), Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition Boston: Little, Brown.
64. Rosenau and Czempiel, (1992), Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65. Rosenberg, J. (1994), The Empire of Civil Society, London: Verso.
66. Rosenthal, AL. (1971), “A Hegelian key to Hegel’s method”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 9, (2): 205–212.
67. Runciman, W. Gary (1998), The Social Animal, London: HarperCollins.
68. Rupert, M. (1993), “Alienation, Capitalism and the Inter-State System” in Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations, ed. by Stephen Gill, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Rupert, Mark. “Marxism”, in Dunne et al., (2007), (1st eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, UK: Oxford University Press.
70. Sassoon, Anne Showstack. (2000), “The space for politics: Globalization, hegemony and passive revolution”, in J. D. Schmidt and Jacques Hersh, Globalization and Social Change, London: Routledge.
71. Sayer, D. The Violence of Abstraction: The Analytic Foundations of Historical Materialism, Oxford: Blackwell.
72. Sked, Alan. (1987), “The Study of International Relations: A Historian’s View”, Millenium 16 (2): pp21-62.
73. Stephen Gill, (1993), (ed.), Gramsci, Historical Materialism, and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Strange, Susan, (1996), The Retreat of the State, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75. Scholte, Jan Aart (1993), International Relations of Social Change, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, p.7.
76. Schmidt, Brian. (1998), The Political Discourse of Anarchy: a Disciplinary History of International Relations, Albany: State University of New York Press.
77. Shaw, M. (1984), “War, Imperialism and the State System: A Critique of Orthodox Marxism for the 1980s”, pp47-70, in Shaw (eds). (1984), War, State and Society, London: Macmillan.
78. Shaw, Martin. (1999), “Globality as a Revolutionary Transformation” in Politics and Globalisation, London: Routledge.
79. Thompson, Edward P. Whigs and Hunters: The Origins of the Black Act, London:Penguin.
80. Waever, Ole. (1996), “The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate” in Smith, S. & Booth, K. & Zalewski, M. (1996), (eds), International Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. Waever, Ole. “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations”, International Organization 52, 4 (2005).
82. Walker, RBJ “History and Structure in the Theory of International Relations” Millennium – Journal of International Studies. 18:2 (June 1989): 167.
83. Waltz, K., (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.
84. Wesson, R., 1976. Marxism: For and Against. London: Temple Smith.
85. Wight, M., 1960. Why is there no International Theory? International Relations, 2(1). pp. 35-48.
86. Wood, Ellen M. (1995), Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 Back to article



Academicus
International Scientific Journal

pISSN 2079-3715
eISSN 2309-1088

Address:
Sheshi i Flamurit, Rruga Muze
Al-9401 Vlorë, Albania
Tel: +355 68 60 60 555
info@academicus.edu.al
https://academicus.edu.al